Beware of premature PCCB
(Porsche Ceramic Composite Brake) failure
The rear
ceramic rotors on my Porche 911 Turbo S had to be replaced after only 12,000
miles at a cost of $10,000. These were their much-promoted Porsche Ceramic
Composite Brakes (PCCB).This was an unexpected shock to me, so I would like to
share my experience with anyone considering ordering the optional PCCB brakes
for a new Porsche in the hope that others won’t have to endure my painful
experience.
My story
started with excited anticipation when I took delivery of my brand-new 911
Turbo S. For those unfamiliar with the Turbo S, this car was a special 911 that
came with more horsepower than the base Turbo and included an extensive list of
options installed as standard equipment. One of these was PCCB.
I was
understandably looking forward to enjoying my new car and was particularly
pleased with the promise of PCCB performance because the marketing literature
said the following:
“The discs are made from a
specially treated carbon-fiber compound that is silicated in a high-vacuum
process at 3,092°F. The resulting material is not only much harder than metal-
it is also more resistant to heat.”
Based on the
Porsche sales pitch most anyone would have thought that PCCB was a must-have
option and money well spent. But the brutal reality is that for me PCCB turned
out to be a huge disappointment because the rear rotors on my Turbo failed at
12,000 miles due to overheating and cost me a massive $10,000 to repair.
Included in these miles were 900 miles of track driving plus 3000-4000 miles of
sporty driving in the hills near my home.
When I
reported the brake failure to Porsche, they blamed it on me and my driving
style and refused to honor their warranty. I was stunned by their denial. I
could not believe that they were not living up to what I felt were their
responsibilities and were blaming me instead. First, I felt that Porsche had
lied to me. How could brakes that are “more resistant to heat” burn out after
only 12,000 miles? Second, I could not and cannot accept their blaming me
because I'm a relatively skilled driver who has taken the time to learn how to
get the most out of my sports car. I have about 25 track days under my belt in
the last four years. Half of these were driving schools including on-track private
coaching. So my technique, I believe, is solid. Plus, I am not an aggressive
driver and don't push the car beyond 90% on track and 70-80% on public roads.
Also, the front brakes normally take much more of the load from braking than
the rears. Yet it was the rear rotors that burned out. Furthermore, the only
caution in any of the car’s documentation was an instruction to have the brakes
inspected before any performance driving event. This I did religiously.
Therefore, I
think one needs to look beyond driving style because, if I could burn out a set
of PCCB rotors, so could anyone. The reason, in my opinion, is that the driver
is not the only one at the controls of a Porsche. In fact, the car is
constantly intervening in the background and overriding the driver's inputs.
For example, one of the installed options on the Turbo S is Porsche Torque
Vectoring Plus (PTV Plus). PTV helps the car turn by applying the brakes to the
inside rear wheel in a corner. These braking actions are completely
imperceptible to the
driver (per Porsche's literature and also my experience). PTV is especially
active, I believe, on the low-speed twisty roads in my area. The net result is
that while you are out enjoying the dynamics of your car, the car's computers
seem to be busy destroying your expensive ceramic brakes. And the car does
this completely without your knowledge because there are no brake temperature sensors or other
real-time warnings on any Porsche to alert you to the dangers to your brakes.
Incidentally, stopping the car to take brake temperature readings did not give
any indication of an overheating problem.
BTW Ferrari
has brake temperature sensors, but Porsche has not installed them. Why not?
They have dozens of other sensors on the car including brake wear sensors, so
this is not a matter of technical infeasibility.
I also know
that my experience is not an isolated incident because I met another Porsche
owner who also had to replace the burnt out PCCB rotors on his relatively new
Turbo S. Two examples are not conclusive proof, but clearly the claims about
the heat resistance of PCCB brakes in the sales literature had to have been
absolutely false. I base this opinion not just on the two examples of brake
failure mentioned here but on the fact that all references to the heat
resistance of ceramic brakes has been removed from the current marketing
literature. The only benefit Porsche now mentions regarding the PCCB is reduced
unsprung weight. Why did they change their literature other than the fact that
the original claims weren’t true? Furthermore, they now include a mild warning
about premature brake wear. I would go beyond their warning to opine that if
you use your car for any high-performance driving, your ceramic rotors will
certainly burn out early. This includes not just track days and autocross but
dynamic driving on twisty public roads.
In my opinion,
anyone considering ordering PCCB for a new Porsche should ask themselves if the
reduced weight is worth the upfront charge plus a $10,000 repair bill every couple
of years, especially since the standard steel brakes stop the car just as well.
Based on my painful experience, the decision is easy. I would never order PCCB as an option again!
I believe the
only one who benefits from the optional PCCB is Porsche itself. PCCB increases
Porsche's already obscene industry-leading profit margin by jacking up the
price of a new car plus fattening their wallets by $10,000 for every brake
replacement. This gives them a perverse incentive, in my opinion, to ignore
problems such as mine because every time a set of rotors burns out they sell
you a replacement set at roughly double the cost of the original option! But if
enough people were to save their hard-earned dollars and opt for steel brakes,
Porsche might get the message and install brake temperature sensors to protect their customers’
investments.
BTW I would
also stay away from PTV. It’s downsides outweigh its benefits as far as I’m
concerned, especially since it’s another costly option.
That was a
pretty long tale, but I felt the need to make my experience public, so that
others might learn from my misfortune. If my story helps even one of you avoid
a painful and expensive experience with PCCB, I will consider the effort to
write this post well worth it.